For PCBA electronic assembly line automation, we feel that [Assembly] is easier to do, or [test] easier to do it? Now the assembly of many actions can rely on the robot arm to help, and the test can do it?


However, with regard to the understanding of Shenzhen Shiqiancheng, it is necessary to perform automation on the production line. In fact, what is lacking most is "people" and it is an "engineer" who adapts equipment. Because whether it is to use a robot arm to help set up a product or test, or to use a modular approach, the tolerances and adaptability of equipment and fixtures will become very important, otherwise an error may create a bad product, even Severely destroyed components.


In addition, when automation is most concerned about “automating for automation”, Shenzhen Baiqiancheng will recommend whether to use automation or not, and whether or not to perform automation or maintenance based on ROI (Return On Investment). What is the most economical and cost-effective production of the original operation, because it is ultimately considered in terms of costs and benefits.


Machine test automation


Taking the current “mobile phone” production as an example, PCBA's automated test of finished products after assembly can use robotic arms to replace the manual taps and touch screen strokes.


The remaining part of the phone is handed over to each other for communication between the Diagnostic Test and the computer's wireless (Bluetooth) commands.


The most troublesome IO connector should be a real plug test. If it is a mobile phone test, you may consider omitting it directly because the phone now has only a headset jack and a micro-USB connector. If the board stage has been tested, it may be possible to directly Omit, or design "Auto-engage" device to achieve.


The final cosmetic inspection (visual/visual inspection) can be performed by the image recognition system.